Filings for 40631
Case Style PETITION OF AT&T TEXAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN MARKETS WITH POPULATIONS LESS THAN 100,000 SHOULD REMAIN REGULATED
61 filing(s).
| Item | File Stamp | Party | Item Type | Filing Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8/3/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | PETITION OF AT&T TEXAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN MARKETS WITH POPULATIONS LESS THAN 100,000 SHOULD REMAIN REGULATED |
| 2 | 8/6/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | ORDER NO 1 REQUIRING COMMISSION STAFF RESPONSE |
| 3 | 8/6/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO DETERMINE WHETHER CERTAIN MARKETS WITH POPULATIONS LESS THAN 100,000 SHOULD REMAIN REGULATED |
| 4 | 8/8/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT - FILE NAME 0807C.052 |
| 5 | 8/20/2012 | PUC LEGAL | PL | COMMISSION STAFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER NO 1 |
| 6 | 8/21/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | ORDER NO 2 ADDRESSING SUFFICIENCY OF APPLICATION AND NOTICE; ADOPTING PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE |
| 7 | 9/7/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | MOTION TO INTERVENE |
| 8 | 9/12/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | REQUEST FOR HEARING ON THE MERITS |
| 9 | 9/18/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | Response to AMA TechTel's Motion to Intervene and Request for Hearing on the Merits |
| 10 | 9/18/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | ORDER NO 3 GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE |
| 11 | 9/19/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | ORDER OF REFERRAL |
| 12 | 9/20/2012 | SOAH | PL | SOAH ORDER NO 1 FILING DESCRIPTION; NOTICE OF HEARING; DISCOVERY, FILING AND SERVICE REQUIREMENTS |
| 13 | 9/20/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | 1ST SET OF RFI DIRECTED TO AMA |
| 14 | 9/21/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | DRAFT PRELIMINARY ORDER |
| 15 | 9/21/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | MOTION TO SEVER |
| 16 | 9/21/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | RFI | 1ST SET OF RFA TO AMA |
| 17 | 9/21/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | OBJECTION TO AT&T TEXAS PROPOSED REQUIRED RESPONSE DEADLINE |
| 18 | 9/21/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | RFI | AMA's First RFIs to AT&T |
| 19 | 9/24/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | Objections to AT&T Texas' First Requests for Information |
| 20 | 9/24/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | LIST OF ISSUES |
| 21 | 9/24/2012 | PUC LEGAL | PL | COMMISSION STAFF'S PROPOSED LIST OF ISSUES AND ISSUE NOT TO BE ADDRESSED |
| 22 | 9/24/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | PROPOSED LIST OF ISSUES |
| 23 | 9/24/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | REVISED DRAFT PRELIMINARY ORDER |
| 24 | 9/25/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | Objections to AMA's First Request RFIs to AT&T Texas |
| 25 | 9/25/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | RFI | OBJECTIONS TO AT&T TEXAS 1ST RFA |
| 26 | 9/26/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | MOTION TO COMPEL AMA TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY |
| 27 | 9/27/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | RFI | Initial Responses to AT&T Texas' First Set of RFIs Directed to AMA |
| 28 | 9/28/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | Motion to Adopt Protective Order |
| 29 | 9/28/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | INITIAL'S RESPONSES TO AT&T TEXAS; 1ST SET OF RFAS DIRECTED TO AMA |
| 30 | 9/28/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | RESPONSE TO AT&T TEXAS' MOTION TO SEVER |
| 31 | 9/28/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | Response to AT&T Texas Motion to Compel AMA to Respond to Discovery |
| 32 | 9/28/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | RFI | RESPONSE TO AMA'S FIRST SET OF RFIS |
| 33 | 9/28/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | PRELIMINARY ORDER |
| 34 | 9/28/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | OUTGOING COMMISSION SIGNED ORDER MAIL LOG |
| 35 | 9/28/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | STATEMENT OF POSITION |
| 36 | 10/2/2012 | SOAH | PL | SOAH ORDER NO 3 DENYING MOTION TO SEVER AND ESTABLISHING SHORTENED DEADLINE FOR FILING RESPONSE |
| 37 | 10/2/2012 | SOAH | PL | SOAH ORDER NO 2 PROTECTIVE ORDER |
| 38 | 10/8/2012 | PUC LEGAL | BR | COMMISSION STAFF'S POST-HEARING BRIEF |
| 39 | 10/8/2012 | PUC LEGAL | PL | COMMISSION STAFF'S PROPOSED CORRECTION TO THE HEARING ON THE MERITS TRANSCRIPT |
| 40 | 10/8/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | BR | Post-Hearing Brief and Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law |
| 41 | 10/8/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | BR | Post-Hearing Brief |
| 42 | 10/11/2012 | SOAH | PL | PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
| 43 | 10/11/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE PROPOSAL FOR DECISION IN THE ABOVE STYLED DOCKET ISSUED ON OCTOBER 11, 2012 WILL BE CONSIDERED AT THE NOVEMBER 16, 2012 OPEN MEETING |
| 44 | 10/16/2012 | SOAH | PL | CERTIFIED EXHIBITS |
| 45 | 10/22/2012 | KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE | PL | HEARING ON THE MERITS, TUESDAY OCTOBER 2, 2012 |
| 46 | 10/25/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
| 47 | 10/25/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
| 48 | 10/25/2012 | PUC LEGAL | PL | COMMISSION STAFF'S EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
| 49 | 11/1/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | Response to Exceptions to the PFD |
| 50 | 11/1/2012 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | RESPONSE TO EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
| 51 | 11/1/2012 | PUC LEGAL | PL | PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT COMMISSION STAFF WILL NOT BE FILING A RESPONSE TO THE EXCEPTIONS TO THE PFD |
| 52 | 11/5/2012 | SOAH | PL | LETTER IN RESPONSE TO EXCEPTIONS |
| 53 | 11/7/2012 | SOAH | PL | LETTER REGARDING RESPONSE TO EXCEPTIONS FILED ON NOVEMBER 2, 2012 CONTAINED AN ERROR |
| 54 | 11/29/2012 | AMA TECHTEL COMMUNICATIONS | PL | REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE |
| 55 | 1/3/2013 | AT&T TEXAS | PL | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION |
| 56 | 1/4/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | DOCKET HAS BEEN PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE OPEN MEETING SCHEDULED ON JANUARY 10, 2013 |
| 57 | 1/9/2013 | COMMISSIONER ANDERSON | PL | OPEN MEETING JANUARY 10, 2013, AGENDA ITEM 2 - MEMO FROM COMMISSIONER ANDERSON |
| 58 | 1/18/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | ORDER OF DISMISSAL |
| 59 | 1/18/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | OUTGOING COMMISSION-SIGNED ORDER MAIL LOG |
| 60 | 3/25/2013 | PUC CADM | EX | HOM- TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2012. |
| 61 | 3/25/2013 | PUC CADM | EX | AT&T EXHIBITS-1-4(RETURNED FROM CADM) |
| Export to Excel | ||||