Filings for 40295
Case Style APPLICATION OF ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. FOR RATE CASE EXPENSES PERTAINING TO PUC DOCKET NO. 39896
105 filing(s).
Item | File Stamp | Party | Item Type | Filing Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 4/3/2012 | PUC CADM | PL | CONTROL NUMBER REQUEST FORM RE: APPLICATION OF ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. FOR RATE CASE EXPENSES PERTAINING TO PUC DOCKET NO. 39896 |
2 | 4/5/2012 | TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS | PL | MOTION TO INTERVENE |
3 | 4/5/2012 | SOAH | PL | SOAH ORDER NO. 1: GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SEVER RATE CASE EXPENSE ISSUES |
4 | 4/12/2012 | STATE AGENCIES` | PL | MOTION TO INTERVENE |
5 | 4/12/2012 | CITIES | PL | MOTION TO INTERVENE |
6 | 8/31/2012 | SOAH | PL | SOAH ORDER NO 2 GRANTING MOTIONS TO INTERVENE, REQUIRING PARTIES TO CONFER AND FILE PROPOSED SCHEDULE |
7 | 9/12/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | PL | RESPONSE TO ORDER NO 2 |
8 | 9/14/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | PL | NOTICE OF CHANGE IN CONTACT INFORMATION |
9 | 9/18/2012 | SOAH | PL | SOAH ORDER NO. 3: ESTABLISHING PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AND NOTICE OF HEARING |
10 | 10/1/2012 | STATE AGENCIES | RFI | 1ST RFI TO ENTERGY TEXAS INC |
11 | 10/3/2012 | OPUC | PL | MOTION TO INTERVENE |
12 | 10/5/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | RFI | Response of Entergy Texas, Inc. to State’s Tenth Request for Information: State 10: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13. |
13 | 10/5/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | RFI | Response of Entergy Texas, Inc. to Staff’s Ninth Request for Information: Staff 9: 1 Addendum 1, 2 Addendum 2, 3 Addendum 1, 4 Addendum 1, 5 Addendum 1, 8 Addendum 1, 9 Addendum 1, 10 Addendum 1, 11addendum 1, 12 Addend |
14 | 10/5/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | RFI | RESPONSE TO STATE'S 9TH RFI STATE 9:1 ADD 2 ADD 2 ADD1 |
15 | 10/5/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | RFI | RESPONSE TO STATE'S 6TH RFI STATE 6:1 ADD 3 |
16 | 10/5/2012 | SOAH | PL | SOAH ORDER NO 4 GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE |
17 | 10/5/2012 | CITIES | TEST | Direct Testimony of Amalija Hodgins |
18 | 10/5/2012 | CITIES | TEST | Supplemental Testimony of Amalija Hodgins |
19 | 10/5/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | TEST | Supplemental Direct Testimony of Stephen F. Morris |
20 | 10/5/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | TEST | Supplemental Direct Testimony of Michael P. Considine |
21 | 10/8/2012 | STATE AGENCIES | RFI | 2ND RFI TO ENTERGY TEXAS INC |
22 | 10/9/2012 | PUC LEGAL | RFI | COMMISSION STAFF'S 1ST RFI TO ENERGY TEXAS INC QUESTION NOS STAFF 1-1 THROUGH STAFF 1-15 |
23 | 10/11/2012 | PUC LEGAL | RFI | COMMISSION STAFF'S 2ND RFI TO ENTERGY TEXAS INC QUESTION NOS STAFF 2-1 THROUGH STAFF 2-7 |
24 | 10/12/2012 | OPUC | RFI | 1ST RFI TO ENTERGY TEXAS INC |
25 | 10/15/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | RFI | RESPONSE TO STATE'S 1ST RFI STATE 1:1 AND 2 |
26 | 10/16/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | TEST | Letter Regarding Documents Being Offered Into Evidence |
27 | 10/19/2012 | STATE AGENCIES | RFI | 3RD RFI TO ENTERGY TEXAS INC |
28 | 10/22/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | RFI | RESPONSE TO STATE'S 1ST RFI |
29 | 10/23/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | RFI | Response of Entergy Texas, Inc. to Staff’s First Request For Information: Staff 1:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15. |
30 | 10/25/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | RFI | RESPONSE TO STAFF'S 9TH RFI |
31 | 10/25/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | RFI | Response of Entergy Texas, Inc. to Staff’s First Request for Information: Staff 2:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. |
32 | 10/25/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | TEST | Supplemental Direct Testimony of Michael P. Considine |
33 | 10/25/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | TEST | Supplemental Direct Testimony of Stephen F. Morris |
34 | 10/26/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | RFI | RESPONSE TO OPUC'S 1ST RFI |
35 | 10/26/2012 | OPUC | RFI | 2ND RFI TO ENTERGY TEXAS INC |
36 | 11/2/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | RFI | RESPONSE TO STATE'S 3RD RFI; STATE'S 1-17 |
37 | 11/5/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | RFI | RESPONSE TO OPUC'S 2ND RFI |
38 | 11/6/2012 | STATE AGENCIES | PL | RECOMMENDATIONS ON ETI'S REQUEST FOR RATE CASE EXPENSES |
39 | 11/6/2012 | PUC LEGAL | TEST | DIRECT TESTIMONY OF BRIAN T MURPHY, RATE REGULATION DIVISION, PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, NOVEMBER 6, 2012 |
40 | 11/6/2012 | OPUC | RFI | 3RD RFI TO ENTERGY TEXAS INC |
41 | 11/6/2012 | OPUC | PL | RECOMMENDATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING |
42 | 11/6/2012 | PUC LEGAL | PL | COMMISSION STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION |
43 | 11/6/2012 | OPUC | TEST | Direct Testimony and Workpapers of Nathan A. Benedict |
44 | 11/7/2012 | PUC LEGAL | PL | COMMISSION STAFF'S REQUEST FOR A HEARING |
45 | 11/13/2012 | OPUC | PL | WITHDRAWAL OF A PORTION OF THE DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NATHAN BENEDICT |
46 | 11/15/2012 | ETI | TEST | Rebuttal Testimony of Michael Considine |
47 | 11/15/2012 | ETI | TEST | Rebuttal Testimony of Stephen Morris |
48 | 11/19/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | TEST | ERRATA NO. 1 OF EXHIBIT SFM - R -2 |
49 | 11/20/2012 | STATE AGENCIES | PL | STATEMENT OF POSITION |
50 | 11/20/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | RFI | RESPONSE TO OPUC'S 3RD RFI |
51 | 11/20/2012 | TIEC | PL | STATEMENT OF POSITION |
52 | 12/4/2012 | KENNEDY REPORTING SERVICE | PL | HEARING ON THE MERITS, WEDNESDAY , NOVEMBER 28,2012 |
53 | 12/5/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | PL | MOTION TO CORRECT HEARING TRANSCRIPT |
54 | 12/6/2012 | STATE AGENCIES | PL | OPPOSITION TO ETI'S MOTION TO CORRECT TRANSCRIPT |
55 | 12/7/2012 | TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS | BR | INITIAL BRIEF |
56 | 12/10/2012 | CITIES | BR | INITIAL BRIEF |
57 | 12/10/2012 | OPUC | BR | Post Hearing Initial Brief |
58 | 12/10/2012 | PUC LEGAL | BR | COMMISSION STAFF'S INITIAL BRIEF |
59 | 12/10/2012 | STATE OF TEXAS | BR | INITIAL BRIEF |
60 | 12/10/2012 | ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. | BR | INITIAL BRIEF |
61 | 12/11/2012 | SOAH | PL | SOAH ORDER NO. 5 DENYING MOTION TO CORRECT HEARING TRANSCRIPT |
62 | 12/21/2012 | OPUC | BR | Post Hearing Reply Brief |
63 | 12/21/2012 | STATE OF TEXAS | BR | Reply Brief |
64 | 12/21/2012 | CITIES | BR | Cities Responsive Brief |
65 | 12/21/2012 | PUC LEGAL | BR | COMMISSION STAFF'S REPLY BRIEF |
66 | 12/21/2012 | ETI | BR | Reply Brief |
67 | 2/19/2013 | SOAH | PL | PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
68 | 2/20/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | EXCEPTIONS AND REPLIES MEMO |
69 | 2/26/2013 | ENTERGY SERVICES INC | PL | JOINT MOTION TO REVISE BRIEFING DATES |
70 | 2/27/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | REVISED OPEN MEETING DATE |
71 | 3/14/2013 | STATE OF TEXAS | PL | STATE AGENCIES' EXCEPTIONS |
72 | 3/14/2013 | PUC LEGAL | BR | STAFF'S EXCEPTIONS TO THE PFD |
73 | 3/14/2013 | AMICI UTILITIES | BR | BRIEF |
74 | 3/14/2013 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | PL | EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
75 | 3/14/2013 | OPUC | PL | DOES NOT INTEND TO FILE EXCEPTIONS TO THE PFD |
76 | 3/15/2013 | AMICI CURIAE UTILITIES | PL | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE |
77 | 3/29/2013 | STATE OF TEXAS | BR | REPLY TO ETI'S EXCEPTIONS AND RESPONSE TO AMICI CURIAE BRIEF |
78 | 3/29/2013 | OPUC | PL | REPLY TO EXCEPTIONS TO THE PFD |
79 | 3/29/2013 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | PL | REPLY TO EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
80 | 3/29/2013 | PUC LEGAL | BR | STAFF'S REPLIES TO EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROPOSAL FOR DECISION |
81 | 4/1/2013 | CITIES | PL | MOTION TO ACCEPT LATE FILED PLEADING |
82 | 4/1/2013 | CITIES | PL | REPLY TO EXCEPTIONS |
83 | 4/11/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | LETTER REQUESTING PARTIES TO CONFIRM THE AMOUNTS SET OUT OR IDENTIFY WHERE IN THE RECORD THE CORRECT AMOUNTS CAN BE FOUND |
84 | 4/11/2013 | THE LAWTON LAW FIRM | PL | CONTACT INFORMATION UPDATE |
85 | 4/12/2013 | SOAH | PL | DONT RECOMMEND ANY CHANGES TO THE PFD IN RESPONSE THERETO |
86 | 4/17/2013 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | PL | RESPONSE TO COMMISSION ADVISING'S APRIL 11 MEMO |
87 | 4/17/2013 | OPUC | PL | LETTER REGARDING MEMORANDUM OF APRIL 11, 2013 |
88 | 4/17/2013 | PUC LEGAL | PL | RECOMMENDATION THAT THE $9,914 ADJUSTMENT TO THE AD VALOREM TAX EXPENSE AMOUNT BE REFLECTED IN THE FINAL ADJUSTMENT CALCULATIONS |
89 | 4/19/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | THIS DOCKET HAS BEEN PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR THE OPEN MEETING ON APRIL 25, 2013 |
90 | 5/21/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | ORDER |
91 | 5/21/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | OUTGOING COMMISSION-SIGNED ORDER MAIL LOG |
92 | 6/10/2013 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | PL | MOTION FOR REHEARING |
93 | 6/19/2013 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | PL | OPINION ADDRESSING RATE CASE EXPENSE ISSUES INVOLVING ONCOR |
94 | 6/20/2013 | PUC LEGAL | PL | STAFF'S REPLY TO MOTION FOR REHEARING |
95 | 6/20/2013 | OPUC | PL | REPLY TO MOTION FOR REHEARING |
96 | 6/21/2013 | STATE AGENCIES | PL | REPLY TO ETI'S MOTION FOR REHEARING |
97 | 6/25/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | NO COMMISSIONER VOTED TO ADD THE MOTION FOR REHEARING TO AN OPEN MEETING AGENDA |
98 | 8/13/2013 | PUC CADM | PL | REQUEST FOR REPRESENTATION BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL |
99 | 8/28/2013 | ENTERGY TEXAS INC | PL | CLEAN COPY OF RATE CASE EXPENSE RIDER 2 |
100 | 1/13/2014 | PUC CADM | EX | HOM-WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28,2012(RETURNED FROM CADM) |
101 | 1/13/2014 | PUC CADM | EX | CITIES-1-2.(RETURNED FROM CADM) |
102 | 1/13/2014 | PUC CADM | EX | COMMISSION STAFF-1-2.(RETURNED FROM CADM) |
103 | 1/13/2014 | PUC CADM | EX | ENTERGY -1-12.(RETURNED FROM CADM) |
104 | 1/13/2014 | PUC CADM | EX | OPUC EXHIBITS -1-3.(RETURNED FROM CADM) |
105 | 1/13/2014 | PUC CADM | EX | STATE AGENCIES EXHIBITS -1-17.(RETURNED FROM CADM) |
Export to Excel |